State v. Pratt

591 So. 2d 272, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11657, 1991 WL 225538
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1991·No. No. 90-1277·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing and vacate our order of December 24, 1990.

The state appeals from an order granting a motion to suppress physical evidence. The trial court based its determination, at least in part, on the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989). That decision has been reversed by the United States Su[273]*273preme Court in Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to permit the trial court to make express findings of fact after applying the test mandated by Florida v. Bostick.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pratt, 591 So. 2d 272, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11657, 1991 WL 225538 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

591 So. 2d 272 (State v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida v. Bostick
501 U.S. 429 (Supreme Court, 1991)
United States v. Carless Jones and Eugene Harvey
707 F.2d 1169 (Tenth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Richard Moskowitz
883 F.2d 1142 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Bostick v. State
593 So. 2d 494 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Bostick v. State
554 So. 2d 1153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)