State v. Pratt
This text of 591 So. 2d 272 (State v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We grant the motion for rehearing and vacate our order of December 24, 1990.
The state appeals from an order granting a motion to suppress physical evidence. The trial court based its determination, at least in part, on the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989). That decision has been reversed by the United States Su[273]*273preme Court in Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to permit the trial court to make express findings of fact after applying the test mandated by Florida v. Bostick.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
591 So. 2d 272, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11657, 1991 WL 225538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pratt-fladistctapp-1991.