State v. Prade

6 N.E.3d 1203, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1467
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2014·No. 2014-0432·Published

Opinion

Summit App. No. 26775, 2014-Ohio-1035. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s amended motion for immediate stay of execution of the judgment mandate, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted until the court’s determination of the jurisdictional question.

O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and French, JJ., dissent. O’Connor, C.J., not participating. Jeffrey E. Froelich, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for O’Connor, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Prade, 6 N.E.3d 1203, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 2014).

6 N.E.3d 1203 (State v. Prade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Prade
2014 Ohio 1035 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)