State v. Powell

73 S.E. 1017, 91 S.C. 5, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 183
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 12, 1912·No. 8133·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was- delivered 'by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This case was heard before magistrate Brad'ham on a warrant charging the defendant with failure to perform-, road duty, under1 sec. 46-0- o-f Criminal Code. The defendant was found guilty and sentenced. An appeal was1 taken to- -the Court o-f General- Sessions- and was heard by his Honor, Judge DeV-ore. The- judgment o-f magistrate’s court was- affirmed.

From- this order an appeal was taken to this- Court. Al-l of the exceptions relate to the testimony, and ar-e to the effect that- 'the- State failed to make o-ut its case, and that there was not sufficient testimony on which to- base a verdict, of guilty. This Court has repeatedly held that a finding of fact by the magistrate, affirmed b-y the Circuit Judge, cannot be reviewed by this Court, if there is any evidence to- support it. Seegers Bros. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry., 73 S. C. 83; 52 S. E. 797; 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 746n; Lewis v. Railroad Co., 78 S. C. 35, 58 S. E. 989. There is- su-ch evidence here.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is- affirmed and case remanded for the purpose o-f executing sentence.

The ChiEE Justice and the other Justices concur in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Powell, 73 S.E. 1017, 91 S.C. 5, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 183 (S.C. 1912).

73 S.E. 1017 (State v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.
80 S.E. 499 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1913)
Brown v. Hughes
77 S.E. 730 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1913)
City of Greenville v. Green
77 S.E. 718 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1913)