State v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Powell

511 S.E.2d 654, 348 N.C. 697

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 29, 1998·No. No. 190A93-2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari and petition for writ of supersedeas are allowed 29 July 1998 for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Superior Court, Cleveland County, for reconsideration of defendant’s motion for appropriate relief in light of this Court’s opinion in State v. McHone, 348 N.C. 254,-S.E.2d -(9 May 1998) (No. 148A91) and State v. Bates, 348 N.C. 29,-S.E.2d-(3 April 1998) (No. 145A01-3)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari and petition for writ of supersedeas are allowed 29 July 1998 for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Superior Court, Cleveland County, for reconsideration of defendant’s motion for appropriate relief in light of this Court’s opinion in State v. McHone, 348 N.C. 254,-S.E.2d -(9 May 1998) (No. 148A91) and State v. Bates, 348 N.C. 29,-S.E.2d-(3 April 1998) (No. 145A01-3)

State v. Powell, 511 S.E.2d 654, 348 N.C. 697 (N.C. 1998).

Pincite

511 S.E.2d 654 (State v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related