State v. . Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Powell

2 S.E.2d 11, 215 N.C. 792, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 375

DecidedApril 12, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 2 S.E.2d 11 (State v. . Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Powell, 2 S.E.2d 11, 215 N.C. 792, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 375 (N.C. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered by the State was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The only exception noted at the trial was to the ruling of the court in permitting a State’s witness, a police officer, to say, in describing his visit to defendant’s premises, where a quantity of whiskey was found, “We took a search warrant,” without producing *793 tbe warrant. There was no motion or request for the production of the warrant, and the objection seems to have been made after the evidence was in.

The exception is without merit.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered by the State was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The only exception noted at the trial was to the ruling of the court in permitting a State’s witness, a police officer, to say, in describing his visit to defendant’s premises, where a quantity of whiskey was found, “We took a search warrant,” without producing *793 tbe warrant. There was no motion or request for the production of the warrant, and the objection seems to have been made after the evidence was in.

The exception is without merit.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 S.E.2d 11, 215 N.C. 792, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-powell-nc-1939.