State v. . Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Powell

2 S.E.2d 11, 215 N.C. 792, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 375

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 12, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered by the State was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The only exception noted at the trial was to the ruling of the court in permitting a State’s witness, a police officer, to say, in describing his visit to defendant’s premises, where a quantity of whiskey was found, “We took a search warrant,” without producing *793 tbe warrant. There was no motion or request for the production of the warrant, and the objection seems to have been made after the evidence was in.

The exception is without merit.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered by the State was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The only exception noted at the trial was to the ruling of the court in permitting a State’s witness, a police officer, to say, in describing his visit to defendant’s premises, where a quantity of whiskey was found, “We took a search warrant,” without producing *793 tbe warrant. There was no motion or request for the production of the warrant, and the objection seems to have been made after the evidence was in.

The exception is without merit.

No error.

State v. . Powell, 2 S.E.2d 11, 215 N.C. 792, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 375 (N.C. 1939).

Pincite

2 S.E.2d 11 (State v. . Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.