State v. . Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Powell

67 S.E. 327, 152 N.C. 840, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 393

DecidedFebruary 25, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 327 (State v. . Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Powell, 67 S.E. 327, 152 N.C. 840, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 393 (N.C. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The evidence in this case fully warranted the court in submitting the case to the jury. The only assignment of error relates to- the evidence of the State’s witness, Eichard Ivey, for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching by his own declarations the defendant’s witness, William Powell.

We do not deem it necessary to- pass on the exception, because, in view of all the evidence, it is not of sufficient importance- to warrant a new trial.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The evidence in this case fully warranted the court in submitting the case to the jury. The only assignment of error relates to- the evidence of the State’s witness, Eichard Ivey, for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching by his own declarations the defendant’s witness, William Powell.

We do not deem it necessary to- pass on the exception, because, in view of all the evidence, it is not of sufficient importance- to warrant a new trial.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.E. 327, 152 N.C. 840, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-powell-nc-1910.