State v. POUSH

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. POUSH

306 S.W.3d 101, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2010 WL 86154

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 2010

DocketWD 69973

StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 101 (State v. POUSH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. POUSH, 306 S.W.3d 101, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2010 WL 86154 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Jerry Poush appeals his convictions on three counts of felonious restraint. He contends the evidence is insufficient to prove that: (1) he substantially interfered with the liberty of the three victims; and (2) his conduct caused a substantial risk of serious injury. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the convictions.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Jerry Poush appeals his convictions on three counts of felonious restraint. He contends the evidence is insufficient to prove that: (1) he substantially interfered with the liberty of the three victims; and (2) his conduct caused a substantial risk of serious injury. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the convictions.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 101, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2010 WL 86154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-poush-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack