State v. POUSH

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. POUSH

306 S.W.3d 101, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2010 WL 86154

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 2010·No. WD 69973·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Jerry Poush appeals his convictions on three counts of felonious restraint. He contends the evidence is insufficient to prove that: (1) he substantially interfered with the liberty of the three victims; and (2) his conduct caused a substantial risk of serious injury. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the convictions.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Jerry Poush appeals his convictions on three counts of felonious restraint. He contends the evidence is insufficient to prove that: (1) he substantially interfered with the liberty of the three victims; and (2) his conduct caused a substantial risk of serious injury. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the convictions.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. POUSH, 306 S.W.3d 101, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 8, 2010 WL 86154 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

306 S.W.3d 101 (State v. POUSH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related