State v. Potts
This text of 220 S.E.2d 10 (State v. Potts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The state appeals from an order of the Cobb Superior Court which in effect directs the extradition to another state of one under indictment in Cobb County or, alternatively, directs a transfer of the indicted to another county within Georgia. Held:
The order of the trial judge is obviously null and void on its face for two reasons: (1) The judge seeks to exercise jurisdiction over an extradition which is an authority reserved exclusively to the Governor (Code Ann. § 44-419); and (2) the judge directs a transfer of the indictee to another county within the state, an action which a superior court judge has neither the discretion nor the authority to do. However, the order is not appealable to this court as its subject matters are not of those for which appeal by the state is specifically authorized by Code Ann. § 6-1001a. The principle that a void judgment can be attacked in any court at any time does not apply to the state in criminal cases. City of Manchester v. Rowe, 60 Ga. App. 567 (3) (4 SE2d 477). Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed and the supersedeas previously issued on the [2]*2void order is vacated.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 S.E.2d 10, 136 Ga. App. 1, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-potts-gactapp-1975.