Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/State v. Potter

State v. Potter

91 A. 1071, 85 N.J.L. 388, 56 Vroom 388, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 305
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Potter. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 N.J.L. 428 →
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 16, 1913·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion Fled in the Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Minturn.

[389]*389For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen/ Voorhees, Kalisch, Vredenburgii, Congdon, Tkeitune, Heprenheimiir, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Potter, 91 A. 1071, 85 N.J.L. 388, 56 Vroom 388, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 305 (N.J. 1913).

91 A. 1071 (State v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.