State v. Potter
91 A. 1071, 85 N.J.L. 388, 56 Vroom 388, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 305
This text of 91 A. 1071 (State v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Potter, 91 A. 1071, 85 N.J.L. 388, 56 Vroom 388, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 305 (N.J. 1913).
Opinion
The judgment under review is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion Fled in the Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Minturn.
[389]*389For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen/ Voorhees, Kalisch, Vredenburgii, Congdon, Tkeitune, Heprenheimiir, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 A. 1071, 85 N.J.L. 388, 56 Vroom 388, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-potter-nj-1913.