State v. Potter
This text of 374 N.W.2d 27 (State v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, Steven A. Potter, pled guilty to a charge of robbery in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-324(1) (Reissue 1979). He was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 2 to 4 years. He appeals his conviction and sentence on the sole ground that the trial court failed to advise him that he had the right to remain silent and to not testify at trial.
This case presents the same issues as those in State v. Wright, ante p. 847, 374 N.W.2d 26 (1985), decided this date, and in this case we rule in the same way and for the same reasons.
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, defendant’s conviction and sentence are vacated, and the cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded for FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 N.W.2d 27, 220 Neb. 866, 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-potter-neb-1985.