State v. Post
21 N.J.L. 699
This text of 21 N.J.L. 699 (State v. Post) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Post, 21 N.J.L. 699 (N.J. 1848).
Opinion
The cause was argued by W. Halsted, for plaintiff in error, no one appearing for defendant.
[700]*700The court affirmed the judgment below by the following vote:
For Affirmance — Green, (C. J.) Robertson,Speer, Porter, Schenck, Spencer, and Whitehead — 7.
For Reversal — The Chancellor — 1.
Cited in State v. Baird, 4 C. E. Green 488.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Franklin v. NJ DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV.
543 A.2d 56 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 N.J.L. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-post-nj-1848.