State v. Post
21 N.J.L. 699
Opinion
The cause was argued by W. Halsted, for plaintiff in error, no one appearing for defendant.
[700]*700The court affirmed the judgment below by the following vote:
For Affirmance — Green, (C. J.) Robertson,Speer, Porter, Schenck, Spencer, and Whitehead — 7.
For Reversal — The Chancellor — 1.
Cited in State v. Baird, 4 C. E. Green 488.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Post, 21 N.J.L. 699 (N.J. 1848).
21 N.J.L. 699 (State v. Post) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. NJ DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV.
543 A.2d 56 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)