State v. Porter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Porter

367 S.W.3d 131, 2012 WL 1850647, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 715

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Porter. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1765 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 2012·No. No. WD 73921·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Chad Porter was convicted in the Morgan County Circuit Court of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”), § 577.010, RSMo. He appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he drove his vehicle while intoxicated. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Chad Porter was convicted in the Morgan County Circuit Court of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”), § 577.010, RSMo. He appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he drove his vehicle while intoxicated. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Porter, 367 S.W.3d 131, 2012 WL 1850647, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 131 (State v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.