State v. Porter

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Porter

670 A.2d 1308, 236 Conn. 908, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 72

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedFebruary 13, 1996

DocketSC 15363

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 670 A.2d 1308 (State v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Porter, 670 A.2d 1308, 236 Conn. 908, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 72 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 800 (AC 13642), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Under the circumstances of this case: 1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was correct in denying the defendant’s request for an evidentiary hearing regarding the admissibility of the defendant’s polygraph evidence?

“2. Should this court reconsider the applicability of the test for determining the admissibility of scientific evidence set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 800 (AC 13642), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Under the circumstances of this case: 1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was correct in denying the defendant’s request for an evidentiary hearing regarding the admissibility of the defendant’s polygraph evidence?

“2. Should this court reconsider the applicability of the test for determining the admissibility of scientific evidence set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993)?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 A.2d 1308, 236 Conn. 908, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-porter-conn-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack