State v. Porche

826 So. 2d 1062, 2002 WL 31126903
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 27, 2002
Docket2D02-176
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 826 So. 2d 1062 (State v. Porche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Porche, 826 So. 2d 1062, 2002 WL 31126903 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

826 So.2d 1062 (2002)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Ronald PORCHE, Appellee.

No. 2D02-176.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 27, 2002.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.

GREEN, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court's downward departure sentence which imposed only time served upon the defendant, Ronald Porche. We reverse and remand for a sentence consistent with the sentencing guidelines.

Porche, who suffers from numerous physical ailments, sought a downward departure sentence based on section 921.0016(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2001), which authorizes such a sentence when a defendant is in need of specialized medical treatment. In State v. Abrams, 706 So.2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), this court reversed a trial court's downward departure sentence where there was no evidence in the record that the defendant required specialized treatment which could not be *1063 provided by the Department of Corrections. See also State v. Stewart, 749 So.2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). In this case, Porche presented an abundance of evidence supporting his assertion that he suffers from numerous serious medical conditions. However, there was no evidence that he will not receive the necessary treatment while in the custody of the Department of Corrections.

Reversed and remanded.

FULMER and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ford
48 So. 3d 948 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Betancourt
40 So. 3d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Green
971 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
State v. Grayson
916 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Mann
866 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 So. 2d 1062, 2002 WL 31126903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-porche-fladistctapp-2002.