State v. Popp

New Mexico Supreme Court

State v. Popp

6 P.2d 200, 35 N.M. 658

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 14, 1931

DocketNo. 3604.

StatusPublished

This text of 6 P.2d 200 (State v. Popp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Popp, 6 P.2d 200, 35 N.M. 658 (N.M. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PARKER, J.

The transcript on appeal in this case was filed June 26, 1930, since which time nothing whatever has been done by way of filing briefs in behalf of appellant, or the taking of any other steps which might possibly toll the time. It is therefore considered by the court, in pursuance of rule XV, section 11, that the appeal in this court should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

BICKLEY, C. J., and WATSON, J., concur. SADLER and HUDSPETH, JJ., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PARKER, J.

The transcript on appeal in this case was filed June 26, 1930, since which time nothing whatever has been done by way of filing briefs in behalf of appellant, or the taking of any other steps which might possibly toll the time. It is therefore considered by the court, in pursuance of rule XV, section 11, that the appeal in this court should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

BICKLEY, C. J., and WATSON, J., concur. SADLER and HUDSPETH, JJ., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 P.2d 200, 35 N.M. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-popp-nm-1931.