State v. Pope
This text of State v. Pope (State v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kenneth Scott Pope a/ka Scotty, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-417
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 21,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott and Susan Olmert Porter, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert Mills Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Kenneth Scott Pope appeals his guilty plea to two counts of trafficking methamphetamine. The plea judge sentenced him to seventeen years imprisonment for each charge to run current. Pope argues the plea judge erred in giving Pope an unconstitutionally disproportionate sentence. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we dismiss[1] Popes appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Pope, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pope-scctapp-2008.