State v. Poole
150 S.E.2d 850, 268 N.C. 463, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1234
Opinion
Defendant’s assignments of error present only the question of nonsuit. State v. Wilson, 263 N.C. 533, 139 S.E. 2d 736; State v. Dishman, 249 N.C. 759, 107 S.E. 2d 750. The preceding statement of the evidence manifests its sufficiency to overrule the motion for nonsuit. The record discloses that throughout the trial the judge correctly applied the pertinent rules of law. Obviously, the jury accepted the State’s evidence and rejected defendant’s. In the trial, we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Poole, 150 S.E.2d 850, 268 N.C. 463, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1234 (N.C. 1966).
150 S.E.2d 850 (State v. Poole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Dishman
107 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
State v. Wilson
139 S.E.2d 736 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)