State v. Poole

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Poole

150 S.E.2d 850, 268 N.C. 463, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1234

DecidedNovember 9, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E.2d 850 (State v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Poole, 150 S.E.2d 850, 268 N.C. 463, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1234 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s assignments of error present only the question of nonsuit. State v. Wilson, 263 N.C. 533, 139 S.E. 2d 736; State v. Dishman, 249 N.C. 759, 107 S.E. 2d 750. The preceding statement of the evidence manifests its sufficiency to overrule the motion for nonsuit. The record discloses that throughout the trial the judge correctly applied the pertinent rules of law. Obviously, the jury accepted the State’s evidence and rejected defendant’s. In the trial, we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s assignments of error present only the question of nonsuit. State v. Wilson, 263 N.C. 533, 139 S.E. 2d 736; State v. Dishman, 249 N.C. 759, 107 S.E. 2d 750. The preceding statement of the evidence manifests its sufficiency to overrule the motion for nonsuit. The record discloses that throughout the trial the judge correctly applied the pertinent rules of law. Obviously, the jury accepted the State’s evidence and rejected defendant’s. In the trial, we find

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E.2d 850, 268 N.C. 463, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-poole-nc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack