State v. Poole

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Poole

863 S.W.2d 616, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1585, 1992 WL 277255

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 1992·No. No. 61248·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a jury conviction of drug trafficking in the second degree in violation of § 195.223(3) RSMo. (1989). We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a jury conviction of drug trafficking in the second degree in violation of § 195.223(3) RSMo. (1989). We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Poole, 863 S.W.2d 616, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1585, 1992 WL 277255 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

863 S.W.2d 616 (State v. Poole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.