State v. Pomianek

80 A.3d 742, 216 N.J. 359, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 1353, 2013 WL 6669740
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 25, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDERED that the cross-petition for certification is granted limited to the following issues: 1) whether N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1(a)(3) chills expression and/or violates due process; 2) whether the Appellate Division impermissibly applied the canon of constitutional avoidance to save N.J.S.A 2C:16-1(a)(3) from invalidation; 3) assuming the Appellate Division was correct in interpreting N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1(a)(3) to require a showing of intent on the part of the actor, whether defendant is entitled as a matter of law to a dismissal of the bias charges on account of double jeopardy; and 4) whether a laugh can constitute a “benefit” within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-2(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pomianek, 80 A.3d 742, 216 N.J. 359, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 1353, 2013 WL 6669740 (N.J. 2013).

80 A.3d 742 (State v. Pomianek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.