State v. Pollard

469 S.W.3d 506, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 886, 2015 WL 5239844
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 8, 2015
DocketNo. ED 101546
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 469 S.W.3d 506 (State v. Pollard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pollard, 469 S.W.3d 506, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 886, 2015 WL 5239844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Byron Pollard (Defendant) appeals the' denial of his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant claims the motion court erred in denying his motion before imposition of sentence because his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary. Wé affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pollard v. Payne
E.D. Missouri, 2021
Pollard v. State
537 S.W.3d 403 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 S.W.3d 506, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 886, 2015 WL 5239844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pollard-moctapp-2015.