State v. Pollard

469 S.W.3d 506, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 886, 2015 WL 5239844
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. No. ED 101546·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Byron Pollard (Defendant) appeals the' denial of his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant claims the motion court erred in denying his motion before imposition of sentence because his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary. Wé affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pollard, 469 S.W.3d 506, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 886, 2015 WL 5239844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

469 S.W.3d 506 (State v. Pollard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pollard v. Payne
E.D. Missouri, 2021
Pollard v. State
537 S.W.3d 403 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)