State v. Pollard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Pollard

77 S.W.3d 91, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2002 WL 1275765

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 11, 2002

DocketNo. ED 79811

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.W.3d 91 (State v. Pollard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pollard, 77 S.W.3d 91, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2002 WL 1275765 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Byron Pollard (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of Trafficking, second degree, and Resisting Arrest, after a bench trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. State v. Rousan, 961 S.W.2d 881, 845 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Byron Pollard (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of Trafficking, second degree, and Resisting Arrest, after a bench trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. State v. Rousan, 961 S.W.2d 881, 845 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 80.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.W.3d 91, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2002 WL 1275765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pollard-moctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack