State v. Polk

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Polk

366 S.W.3d 542, 2011 WL 4025488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 2011

DocketWD 71598

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 S.W.3d 542 (State v. Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Polk, 366 S.W.3d 542, 2011 WL 4025488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lee Polk appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree, armed criminal action, robbery in the second degree, and domestic assault in the second degree, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of an alternative perpetrator and in overruling his objections to the testimony of one of the State’s witnesses. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lee Polk appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree, armed criminal action, robbery in the second degree, and domestic assault in the second degree, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of an alternative perpetrator and in overruling his objections to the testimony of one of the State’s witnesses. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 S.W.3d 542, 2011 WL 4025488, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-polk-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack