State v. Politte

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Politte

428 S.W.3d 783, 2014 WL 1692801, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 479

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 2014·No. No. WD 76225·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Charles Politte appeals his convictions following a jury trial for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo 2000, second degree assault, section 565.060, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the prosecutor to improperly comment on his failure to testify during closing arguments. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Charles Politte appeals his convictions following a jury trial for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo 2000, second degree assault, section 565.060, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the prosecutor to improperly comment on his failure to testify during closing arguments. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Politte, 428 S.W.3d 783, 2014 WL 1692801, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 479 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

428 S.W.3d 783 (State v. Politte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.