State v. Poland

514 A.2d 812, 1986 Me. LEXIS 910
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 10, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 514 A.2d 812 (State v. Poland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Poland, 514 A.2d 812, 1986 Me. LEXIS 910 (Me. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Alpheus Poland appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Lincoln County, entered on a jury verdict of guilty of gross sexual misconduct in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (1985). He challenges the admission of hearsay testimony without objection and the sufficiency of the evidence. Our review of the record discloses that the admission of the hearsay testimony did not rise to the level of obvious error, see State v. True, 438 A.2d 460, 468 (Me. 1981), and a trier of fact rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. True
438 A.2d 460 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
514 A.2d 812, 1986 Me. LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-poland-me-1986.