State v. Polanco

756 P.2d 1285, 92 Or. App. 93
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 6, 1988·No. 86-0383; CA A42859·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance (heroin) and two counts of delivery and two counts of possession of a controlled substance (heroin and cocaine). He appeals, assigning four errors. We vacate the conspiracy conviction and otherwise affirm.

In his fourth assignment,1 defendant contends, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in not merging his conviction for conspiracy to deliver heroin with his conviction for delivery of heroin. We agree. ORS 161.485(3); State v. McNamer, 80 Or App 418, 421, 722 P2d 51 (1986). We therefore vacate the conspiracy conviction.2

Remanded with instructions to vacate conviction for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance; otherwise affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Polanco, 756 P.2d 1285, 92 Or. App. 93 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

756 P.2d 1285 (State v. Polanco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McNamer
722 P.2d 51 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Barnes
677 P.2d 1103 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)