State v. Polanco

17 A.3d 69, 300 Conn. 933, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 146
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 6, 2011
DocketSC 18771
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.3d 69 (State v. Polanco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Polanco, 17 A.3d 69, 300 Conn. 933, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 146 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn. App. 323 (AC 31616), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly merged the lesser included offense into the sentence on the greater offense, pursuant to State v. Chicano, 216 Conn. 699, 584 A.2d 426 (1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1254, 111 S. Ct. 2898, 115 L. Ed. 2d 1062 (1991), rather than dismiss the conviction on the lesser offense?”
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chicano
584 A.2d 425 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)
State v. Polanco
11 A.3d 188 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.3d 69, 300 Conn. 933, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-polanco-conn-2011.