State v. Pogue

412 P.3d 277, 290 Or. App. 452
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 22, 2018·No. A161594·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*453Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm (Count 1), unlawful use of a weapon (Counts 2 and 3), and menacing (Counts 4 and 5). He assigns error to the trial court's entry of judgment designating Counts 2, 3, and 4 as crimes "constituting domestic violence," ORS 132.586.1 The state concedes that the trial court's insertion of the phrase "constituting domestic violence" in Counts 2 through 4 was error because the state never alleged that Count 3 was a crime constituting domestic violence and because the state decided not to pursue proof of that element with regard to Counts 2 and 4. We agree, accept the state's concession, and remand for entry of a corrected judgment that deletes all references to the "constituting domestic violence" element from the judgment of conviction. See State v. Neighbors , 283 Or. App. 488, 489, 388 P.3d 1250 (2017). We otherwise affirm defendant's judgment of conviction.2

Remanded for entry of a corrected judgment deleting all references to "constituting domestic violence"; otherwise affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pogue, 412 P.3d 277, 290 Or. App. 452 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

412 P.3d 277 (State v. Pogue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Neighbors
388 P.3d 1250 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)