State v. Poe

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Poe

329 S.W.3d 407, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 24, 2011 WL 92046

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2011·No. ED 94221·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Deauntee J. Poe, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to eighteen years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. No error of law appears, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Deauntee J. Poe, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to eighteen years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. No error of law appears, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Poe, 329 S.W.3d 407, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 24, 2011 WL 92046 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

329 S.W.3d 407 (State v. Poe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related