State v. Poche
103 So. 341, 158 La. 14, 1925 La. LEXIS 2012
Opinion
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted, under separate bills of information, for manufacturing intoxicating liquor and for having the liquor in his possession for beverage purposes. There is no bill of exception in the record, nor assignment of error; and, as far as we observe, there is no error.
The convictions are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Poche, 103 So. 341, 158 La. 14, 1925 La. LEXIS 2012 (La. 1925).
103 So. 341 (State v. Poche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.