State v. Poag
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Neivus Renord POAG.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Daniel Shatz, Wilmington, for Neivus Poag.
John Barkley, Assistant Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State of NC.
Prior report: 159 N.C.App. 312, 583 S.E.2d 661.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of December 2003."
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of December 2003."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
590 S.E.2d 857 (State v. Poag) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.