State v. Plehm
This text of 70 A. 1102 (State v. Plehm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plehm was convicted in the Bergen Quarter Sessions upon an indictment charging him with the burning of a certain building and its contents, that were insured against fire, with intent to prejudice the insurance company. He sued out a writ of error from the Supreme Court, and in that court the conviction was affirmed. The present writ of error brings the judgment of affirmance under review.
Plaintiff in error relies upon alleged errors committed in the trial. Upon an examination of the record we are unable to discover error.
The judgment under review should therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vroom:, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 A. 1102, 75 N.J.L. 941, 46 Vroom 941, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-plehm-nj-1908.