State v. Plante
This text of 271 A.2d 631 (State v. Plante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE
v.
Edward G. PLANTE.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Herbert F. DeSimone, Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Edward G. Plante, pro se, Howard.
James Cardono, Public Defender, for petitioner.
ORDER
Respondent is directed to file his answer to the petition for habeas corpus and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer to be made in compliance with the provisions of Provisional Order No. 7, to which reference is made herein.
Motion for assistance of counsel is granted, and the Public Defender is directed to represent petitioner in the further prosecution of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-plante-ri-1970.