State v. Place
This text of 327 S.W.3d 627 (State v. Place) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Jeffrey Place (“Appellant”) appeals his convictions of one count of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015 1 . one count of second degree domestic assault in violation of section 565.073, one count of first degree assault of a law enforcement officer in violation of section 565.081 2 and one count of unlawful possession of a weapon in violation of section 571.020. 3 Appellant raises two points on appeal. He claims the trial court erred in admitting testimony regarding his facial expression at the time of the incident. Appellant also claims the trial court committed plain error when it responded to a question presented by the jury during deliberations regarding when Appellant would be eligible for parole.
*628 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
327 S.W.3d 627, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1739, 2010 WL 5174487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-place-moctapp-2010.