State v. Pitts

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pitts. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 537
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 2013·No. SCWC-30559·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-30559

14-MAY-2013

01:18 PM

SCWC-30559

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

JOSEPH PITTS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30559; CR. NO. 09-1-0097)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Joseph Pitts’

application for writ of certiorari filed on April 17, 2013, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument.

The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the parties shall file a supplemental brief by May 31, 2013, not to exceed ten pages in length, addressing whether the circuit court committed plain error in not reinstating standby counsel and/or in not appointing

substitute counsel post-verdict for petitioner with regard to his post-verdict motions and sentencing.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 14, 2013.

Kevin O’Grady /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Sonja J. McCullen for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pitts, (haw 2013).

State v. Pitts (State v. Pitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.