State v. Pitts
This text of State v. Pitts (State v. Pitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30559 14-MAY-2013 01:18 PM
SCWC-30559
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
JOSEPH PITTS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30559; CR. NO. 09-1-0097)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Joseph Pitts’
application for writ of certiorari filed on April 17, 2013, is
hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument.
The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk
regarding scheduling.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the parties shall file
a supplemental brief by May 31, 2013, not to exceed ten pages in
length, addressing whether the circuit court committed plain
error in not reinstating standby counsel and/or in not appointing substitute counsel post-verdict for petitioner with regard to his
post-verdict motions and sentencing.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 14, 2013.
Kevin O’Grady /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Sonja J. McCullen for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Pitts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pitts-haw-2013.