State v. Pittman

26 N.E.3d 823, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1487
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 2015·No. 2015-0077·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marion App. No. 9-13-65, 2014-0hio-5001. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ judgment entry filed December 19, 2014:

“Is a person subject to prosecution under R.C. 2929.21(B) for the nonpayment of an arrearage-only child support order when he or she has no current legal obligation to support the emancipated child?”

The conflict ease is State v. Dissinger, 5th Dist. Delaware No. 02CA-A-02-010, 2002-0hio-5301.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pittman, 26 N.E.3d 823, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1487 (Ohio 2015).

26 N.E.3d 823 (State v. Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bettis
2016 Ohio 4615 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)