State v. Pittman
This text of 720 S.E.2d 683 (State v. Pittman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Roshun Kent'e PITTMAN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sue Genrich Berry, Wilmington, for Pittman, Roshun Kent'e.
Anne J. Brown, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 22nd of November 2011 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is
*684 "Dismissed ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2012."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
720 S.E.2d 683, 2012 WL 363755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pittman-nc-2012.