State v. Pitolo

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pitolo. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 Haw. 100
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 22, 2018·No. SCWC-16-0000413·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000413 22-MAR-2018 01:49 PM

SCWC-16-0000413

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

LAURA PITOLO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000413; CR. NO. 15-1-0407)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Laura Pitolo’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 29, 2018, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 22, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pitolo, (haw 2018).

State v. Pitolo (State v. Pitolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.