State v. Pitman
124 A. 926, 99 N.J.L. 527, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 186
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For ajjirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn,. Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, 'Van Buskiric, Clark, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pitman, 124 A. 926, 99 N.J.L. 527, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 186 (N.J. 1924).
124 A. 926 (State v. Pitman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ciuffini
395 A.2d 904 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
State v. Begyn
156 A.2d 15 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
State v. Morrison
96 A.2d 723 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
State v. Janiec
94 A.2d 666 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
State v. Edelman
88 A.2d 516 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)