State v. Pinkham
This text of 520 A.2d 341 (State v. Pinkham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
After a jury trial in Superior Court (Hancock County) defendant Edward Pinkham was convicted of aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208(1)(C) (1983). On appeal Pinkham challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding that the circumstances of his assault upon the victim, David Holland, manifested extreme indifference to the value of human life, a finding necessary for the assault to be “aggravated” under the governing statute. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the jury could rationally find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged, including circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).
The entry is: Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 A.2d 341, 1987 Me. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pinkham-me-1987.