State v. Pineda

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Pineda

196 So. 3d 1282, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12065, 2016 WL 4205350

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 2016·No. No. 4D15-4658·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the county court’s order finding the mandatory $5,000 civil penalty imposed for solicitation of prostitution under section 796.07(6), Florida Statutes (2014), to be unconstitutionally excessive. See State v. Jones, 180 So.3d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

GERBER, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the county court’s order finding the mandatory $5,000 civil penalty imposed for solicitation of prostitution under section 796.07(6), Florida Statutes (2014), to be unconstitutionally excessive. See State v. Jones, 180 So.3d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

GERBER, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

State v. Pineda, 196 So. 3d 1282, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12065, 2016 WL 4205350 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

196 So. 3d 1282 (State v. Pineda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related