State v. Pinder

524 So. 2d 501, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1117, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1864, 1988 WL 44468
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1988·No. No. 87-1970·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In response to the state’s appeal from the trial court’s ruling granting suppression of evidence and discharge, counsel for appellee filed a memorandum brief confessing error and a motion for leave to withdraw. Proceeding in the manner outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 19 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), this court permitted appellee thirty days within which to file a statement of points. Appellee has not filed his brief or statement. Accordingly, we hold that the state’s appeal has merit. See United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. Torres, 741 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir.1984). Cf. State v. Suco, 521 So.2d 1100 (Fla.1988) (owner of premises, not casual visitor, has standing to challenge search as violative of fourth amendment rights).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pinder, 524 So. 2d 501, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1117, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1864, 1988 WL 44468 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

524 So. 2d 501 (State v. Pinder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Jose Celso Garcia, Michael Trupei
741 F.2d 363 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
State v. Suco
521 So. 2d 1100 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)