State v. Pindell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Pindell

147 S.E.2d 580, 267 N.C. 130, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 997

DecidedApril 20, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E.2d 580 (State v. Pindell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pindell, 147 S.E.2d 580, 267 N.C. 130, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 997 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit interposed at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. The State’s evidence was sufficient to require the submission of the charges of breaking and entering and larceny to the jury. This assignment of error is overruled.

The remaining assignments of error have been carefully examined and in our opinion they present no prejudicial error. In the trial below we find

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit interposed at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. The State’s evidence was sufficient to require the submission of the charges of breaking and entering and larceny to the jury. This assignment of error is overruled.

The remaining assignments of error have been carefully examined and in our opinion they present no prejudicial error. In the trial below we find

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 S.E.2d 580, 267 N.C. 130, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pindell-nc-1966.