State v. Pilip

826 P.2d 125, 111 Or. App. 649, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 439
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 26, 1992
DocketC90-06-33467, C90-06-33840, C90-05-33142; CA A67915, A67916, A67917
StatusPublished

This text of 826 P.2d 125 (State v. Pilip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pilip, 826 P.2d 125, 111 Or. App. 649, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 439 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks modification of the sentence imposed by the trial court after a trial on stipulated facts. The court found defendant guilty except for insanity on three charges of assault in the second degree. It further found that he poses a substantial danger to others and is not a fit candidate for conditional release. Therefore, it ordered defendant placed under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) for 10 years.

Defendant asserts that the trial court erred by ordering PSRB to make certain treatment and discharge decisions. The trial court’s judgment provides:

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should the Psychiatric Security Review Board find defendant to be in remission due to medication, said defendant shall not be terminated from said Board jurisdiction based on this fact, but that instead, defendant may be placed in a community setting the Board might find appropriate for continued supervision, including supervised administration of medication, for the balance of his commitment to Psychiatric Security Review Board jurisdiction. ’ ’

Once jurisdiction passes to PSRB, the trial court’s jurisdiction terminates, and it has no authority to order conditions of release or otherwise interfere with PSRB’s supervision of the case. ORS 161.327(1), (6).1 Therefore, we vacate the portion [651]*651of the judgment that places conditions on PSRB’s supervision and release of defendant.

Portion of judgment placing conditions on Psychiatric Security Review Board’s supervision of defendant vacated; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 161.327
Oregon § 161.327
§ 161.319
Oregon § 161.319
§ 16
Oregon § 16

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 P.2d 125, 111 Or. App. 649, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pilip-orctapp-1992.