State v. Pilgrim

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Pilgrim

705 N.E.2d 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 893

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1999

Docket98-497

StatusPublished

This text of 705 N.E.2d 690 (State v. Pilgrim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pilgrim, 705 N.E.2d 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 893 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Pickaway App. Nos. 97CA2 and 97CA4. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On March 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice of a motion to certify a conflict pending in the Court of Appeals for Pickaway County. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal until the court of appeals determined whether to certify a conflict. Whereas a copy of a court of appeals’ order certifying a conflict has not been filed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(1), and the appellant has not filed a notice that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of this order why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickaway App. Nos. 97CA2 and 97CA4. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On March 11, 1998, appellant filed a notice of a motion to certify a conflict pending in the Court of Appeals for Pickaway County. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal until the court of appeals determined whether to certify a conflict. Whereas a copy of a court of appeals’ order certifying a conflict has not been filed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(1), and the appellant has not filed a notice that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of this order why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 N.E.2d 690, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1494, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pilgrim-ohio-1999.