State v. Pike

205 N.C. 176
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 20, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Both orders of the clerk, purporting to allow tlie defendants to appeal in forma pauperis, were improvidently entered: The first for want of sufficient affidavit to support it (S. v. Martin, 172 N. C., 977, 90 S. E., 502) ; the second for want of authority to allow it at the time. Powell v. Moore, 204 N. C., 654; S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.

The Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Powell v. Moore, supra.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pike, 205 N.C. 176 (N.C. 1933).

205 N.C. 176 (State v. Pike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Morgan
52 P.2d 186 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)