State v. Pierson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Pierson

24 S.W.3d 720, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2000 WL 14661

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 11, 2000

DocketNo. ED 75556

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 S.W.3d 720 (State v. Pierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pierson, 24 S.W.3d 720, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2000 WL 14661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Albert Lee Pierson (appellant) appeals convictions of robbery in the first degree, pursuant to Section 569.020 RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo (1994). We have reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Albert Lee Pierson (appellant) appeals convictions of robbery in the first degree, pursuant to Section 569.020 RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo (1994). We have reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.W.3d 720, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2000 WL 14661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pierson-moctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack