State v. Pierson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Pierson

24 S.W.3d 720, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2000 WL 14661

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2000·No. No. ED 75556·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Albert Lee Pierson (appellant) appeals convictions of robbery in the first degree, pursuant to Section 569.020 RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo (1994). We have reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Albert Lee Pierson (appellant) appeals convictions of robbery in the first degree, pursuant to Section 569.020 RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo (1994). We have reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Pierson, 24 S.W.3d 720, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2000 WL 14661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

24 S.W.3d 720 (State v. Pierson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related