State v. Pierre

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Pierre

853 A.2d 530, 270 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 335

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 16, 2004·No. SC 17227·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 28 (AC 24225), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the admission by the trial court of a codefendant’s statement pursuant to State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 513 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L. Ed. 2d 598 (1986), did not violate Whelan's requirement of personal knowledge, satisfied the adoptive admission and dual inculpatory statement rules, and did not abridge the defendant’s state and federal rights to confrontation?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 28 (AC 24225), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the admission by the trial court of a codefendant’s statement pursuant to State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 513 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L. Ed. 2d 598 (1986), did not violate Whelan's requirement of personal knowledge, satisfied the adoptive admission and dual inculpatory statement rules, and did not abridge the defendant’s state and federal rights to confrontation?”

State v. Pierre, 853 A.2d 530, 270 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 335 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

853 A.2d 530 (State v. Pierre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related