State v. Pierre
853 A.2d 530, 270 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 335
This text of 853 A.2d 530 (State v. Pierre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Pierre, 853 A.2d 530, 270 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 335 (Colo. 2004).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 28 (AC 24225), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the admission by the trial court of a codefendant’s statement pursuant to State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 513 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L. Ed. 2d 598 (1986), did not violate Whelan's requirement of personal knowledge, satisfied the adoptive admission and dual inculpatory statement rules, and did not abridge the defendant’s state and federal rights to confrontation?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Pierre
890 A.2d 474 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
853 A.2d 530, 270 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pierre-conn-2004.