State v. Pierce
230 P.3d 1055, 168 Wash. 2d 1027, 2010 Wash. LEXIS 373
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Chad Alan PIERCE, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered this matter at its April 27, 2010, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review is granted and the matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division One for reconsideration in light of State v. Rafay, 167 Wash.2d 644, 222 P.3d 86 (2009).
For the Court
/s/MADSEN, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pierce, 230 P.3d 1055, 168 Wash. 2d 1027, 2010 Wash. LEXIS 373 (Wash. 2010).
230 P.3d 1055 (State v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Vance
230 P.3d 1055 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)