State v. Pierce
This text of 230 P.3d 1055 (State v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Chad Alan PIERCE, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered this matter at its April 27, 2010, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review is granted and the matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division One for reconsideration in light of State v. Rafay, 167 Wash.2d 644, 222 P.3d 86 (2009).
For the Court
/s/MADSEN, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 P.3d 1055, 168 Wash. 2d 1027, 2010 Wash. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pierce-wash-2010.