State v. Pierce
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000427 06-DEC-2012 02:47 PM
SCWC-11-0000427
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
WENDY PIERCE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000427; CASE NO. 2DTC-10-006049)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 22, 2012, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 6, 2012.
James S. Tabe, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for Petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Peter A. Hanano for Respondents /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pierce (State v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.