State v. Pierce
806 A.2d 1056, 261 Conn. 914, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 353
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 516 (AC 19692), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly invoke the ‘plain error’ doctrine in this case?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly construe General Statutes § 54-254 (a)?
“3. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the requirement that the defendant register as a sexual offender and order a hearing to determine whether the defendant committed the offense of kidnapping for a sexual purpose?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pierce, 806 A.2d 1056, 261 Conn. 914, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 353 (Colo. 2002).
806 A.2d 1056 (State v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Pierce
849 A.2d 375 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)